Complété
PHope
2 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
janv. 11, 2018
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 3.0
Histoire 4.0
Acting/Cast 5.5
Musique 4.0
Degrés de Re-visionnage 4.0
Sometimes, these old dramas can prove to be gold. As the very first to start the trends of the popular themes in today's dramas, they have an innocence and a nostalgic note to them. However, Sungkyunkwan Scandal was just okay, and after a while, tiring. The story started really well, with an interesting plot and the theme was kind of original and cute. However, the story started to drag after a while. Plus, the leading lady was annoying (not her performance of course, she was really good, but her character was just...eh...) The dynamics of friendship were okay and nice, but the big Scandal didn't have the gravity that it should have unfortunately. So, 3 out of 10.

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Abandonné 9/20
precious_101
4 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
nov. 18, 2020
9 épisodes vus sur 20
Abandonné 3
Globalement 5.5
Histoire 7.0
Acting/Cast 10
Musique 3.0
Degrés de Re-visionnage 1.0
As i was reading the reviews i felt so weird seeing as i am one of the few people that didnt like this drama

Story: the story was nothing special it was different but at the same time moments of it were cliche for me and i could guess what was going to happen. I usually favour the originals over the remakes but for this i loved the Chinese drama remake which i 100% recommend

Acting: the acting was good but my whole issue was the female lead who made it really hard for me to watch. I dont know how other people didnt find her annoying but thats all she was - apart from being smart she has nothing else going on for her, she was unlikeable, unpleasant to even be around and once again ANNOYING i wanted to continue with this drama but there was nothing insanely special that could have made me stay

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
Brenda Tran
2 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
avril 28, 2016
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 8.5
Histoire 8.0
Acting/Cast 10
Musique 9.0
Degrés de Re-visionnage 10
LOVED the cast! I've rewatched this series a few times and the one thing that keeps me going is the connection between the 4 main roles.
Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
jinja b
1 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
mai 7, 2016
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 9.5
Histoire 10
Acting/Cast 10
Musique 9.5
Degrés de Re-visionnage 10
Perfect!! for HISTORICAL....


Great actors/actresses even the supporting roles... I love the school cheerers!...

It's a history so a lot of lessons learned, they just add a romance to make it more interesting... But I love the classroom setting more..

Highly recommended.. It's as if you're not watching a saeguk... Very entertaining, sometimes you're brain will also get active just by watching this...
Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
emerald_hill
1 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
févr. 10, 2016
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 7.5
Histoire 8.0
Acting/Cast 8.5
Musique 7.0
Degrés de Re-visionnage 2.5
Honestly, I don't know what should I write here... I liked the plot, the show was funny and entertaining, the characters interesting and the actors play was top-noch, really amazing. :D
But in the last episodes I just had that feel that I don't even need to watch this to know what will happen, it was immediately obvious, predictable: scenes, dialogs... So sometimes I was just fast-forwarding video.
On a final note, it is a good show, some people may get bored sometimes, but this that won't I can sincerly say that it won't be a lost time. So regardless of some factors that I disliked I still recommend this drama.

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
cyssan
1 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
oct. 30, 2016
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 1
Globalement 10
Histoire 10
Acting/Cast 10
Musique 10
Degrés de Re-visionnage 10
As of writing, I'm watching the series for the second time. I just finished watching love in the moonlight and wrote a review about it. Somehow, I couldn't help comparing the two series. What makes them different? What did I love about SS that I measure all new gender benders to it?

So far I came up with these:

- the leading lady is smart. Now, I don't know about other women out there but I think we need more heroines we can admire for their wit and their talents. Not just their beauty.

"I could live in the house of the *minister of war* but in the end I would just be woman who was only worth 100 nyang."

- the series is believable. It handles issues like graft and corruption, factions within our society, the need for education and critical thinking, prostitution...

I still have 16 more episodes to go. will update and edit my review as I go. - 10/30/2016

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
MG Mayre
0 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
oct. 24, 2023
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 7.5
Histoire 7.0
Acting/Cast 10
Musique 7.0
Degrés de Re-visionnage 5.5
Sungkyunkwan Scandal (2010)– this drama has a powerful main cast and seeing the cast nowadays that already have good careers, it's amazing that they were formed for this drama. Since it was shown in our local TV network, it was hyped but I was not that interested to watch it. I did am happy that I watched this one as a starting Korean drama. This drama is good for newbies especially those that don’t like historical dramas (just like me before) so to take historical dramas in a ligher mood. I don’t quite remember the storyline of the drama nor the drama itself but I do know that I did not quite understood the concept of "Sungkyunkwan" (which I do understand now already). Well, anyway I don't have the energy to rewatch this.

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
Andy
0 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
avril 16, 2017
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 8.0
Histoire 8.0
Acting/Cast 10
Musique 5.5
Degrés de Re-visionnage 1.0
I watched this because of Song Joon Ki. At first I was not so interested,and would just wait to see Song Joong Ki's scenes. But eventually I liked Yoo Ah In's character and enjoyed the story. I enjoyed the friendship between the 4 main leads more than the love story.
Joong Ki's character is very different from that of DOTS, thus I enjoyed watching him.
Yoo Ah In's character is lovable also.
I would recommend you watching this if you have the luxury of time but I don;t think I will watch it again. I might just browse some SongJoongKi's scenes randomly.
Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
lilybit
0 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
juil. 17, 2024
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 4.5
Histoire 4.5
Acting/Cast 6.0
Musique 4.0
Degrés de Re-visionnage 3.5
Cette critique peut contenir des spoilers

Only watched for Yoo Ah In

Here's the thing, I can see why people like this drama, especially if it's a nostalgic thing for them. Unfortunately, watching it now more than ten years later with no sentimental feelings towards it, it really does not hold up. It comes across as janky and low budget and barely held together.
Okay, so I'm going to sound like a hater, but let me vent here for a moment. I really hated the FL and ML. They both had the personality of mayonnaise and were about as interesting (more so in the case of the ML, who was not a very good actor). Due to this, I actually skipped most of their scenes, which surprise surprise is almost the whole drama.
But on that note, I weirdly really liked Song Joonki's character. He's not an actor that I typically enjoy, but he was really great in this drama and I finally understood why people liked him. He was probably the strongest actor here (sorry Yoo Ah In, I love you, but this is early days for you and you clearly hadn't reached your final form yet). Yoo Ah In, while not as strong as Song Joonki, was still good too and I really only watched both of their scenes throughout the drama.
I'm definitely hating on this a lot, but I did finish it because it does have that "something" that a lot of the classic kdramas have.

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
Gabby
0 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
juil. 18, 2019
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 7.0
Histoire 7.0
Acting/Cast 9.0
Musique 7.0
Degrés de Re-visionnage 6.0
I'm on the fence about period dramas/shows/movies in general, and this one didn't swing me in any direction. I don't think it was a bad drama, but I didn't find the story to be particularly interesting.

The romance is very, very, very slow burn. That alone wasn't much of an issue to me, but I thought Lee Sun Joon and Moon Jae Shin were boring characters, and they have so many scenes that I struggled a bit to finish the episodes.

This drama absolutely sold Song Joong Ki to me, though. His character, Goo Jong Ha, was definitely the most endearing of the group, and I looked forward to his scenes on every episode. He was very flouncy and energetic, a good comic relief without being exaggerated, and in the few occasions he had more dramatic scenes, he killed it.

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
CJB56
0 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
mai 5, 2021
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 7.5
Histoire 8.0
Acting/Cast 8.5
Musique 6.5
Degrés de Re-visionnage 6.0
Cette critique peut contenir des spoilers

Sungkyunkwan Scandal vs In a Class of Her Own

WARNING: This is going to be very long! I have posted the same review on both dramas.

This review is mostly a comparison of the two. So, for people that have watched one or the other and wish to decide whether to watch the remake or the original, this may be helpful.
To begin with I would like to point out the differences in how I watched the dramas. I am Chinese and can understand the language a lot more than I can Korean (but I am not fluent, so I still need subs). I am also more familiar with the Chinese entertainment industry, therefore discovering In a Class of Her Own first. I watched that drama within about a week. However, with Sungkyunkwan Scandal it took months to complete, and I watched it at a much more staggered approach. The only reason I had retained the plot in my head was because I had watched In a Class of Her Own. This does not mean that I preferred the remake – it is just that I took different approaches to watching the versions.

The Quartet and the Korean or Chinese equivalent
Kim Yoon-Shik/Hee (Park Min Young) and Xue Wenbin/xi (Ju Jingyi)
Lee Sun-Joon (Park Yoo Chun) and Feng Chengjun (Song Weilong)
Moon Jae-Shin (Yoo Ah In) and Lei Zixin (Wang Ruichang)
Gu Yong-Ha (Song Joong Ki) and Yu Lexuan (Bi Wenjun)


For those who are interested in the drama…

Is the plot compelling or interesting? Which to choose?
The plot is not particularly out of the ordinary. Sungkyunkwan Scandal came out in 2010 and there have been plenty other stories before and after this, based on the tale of The Butterfly Lovers, that involve a female crossdressing as a man to join an all-male school. If you are looking for a political and romance drama, then I would recommend Sungkyunkwan Scandal. If you are looking for a more light-hearted, comedic drama that highlights friendship over romance, then In a Class of Her Own would be better. In both, it shows the bonds that people can make no matter the class. A huge positive of the dramas is the friendship between the main 4.
If you can’t decide whether you want to watch the remake after watching the original, then I’ll say that plotlines that were less developed in the 20 episodes of the original are almost all further explored in the remake. The Chinese version is almost like a fan service remake for Sungkyunkwan Scandal, simplifying the original plot and satisfying the fans by focusing on points that were less explored.


Characters:

Kim Yoon Hee and Xue Wenxi
I don’t have a big opinion on our female lead. She is a rather typical female lead who is independent and will do anything for those she loves. Kim Yoon Hee is more straightforward in her ambitons and goals as well as with her romantic feelings towards Lee Sun Joon, and I believe she is smarter, which made her have a bigger impression on me.

Does she look like a guy?
You may find this a weird query to have but you would be surprised as to how many people commented on this matter. I personally didn’t care whether she actually looked like a guy – sure I occasionally thought ‘It’s so obvious that she is a girl!’ but it didn’t bother my viewing of the dramas. I watched both dramas on Viki with the timed comments on and lots of people repeatedly pointed out the obliviousness of the guys on the fact that the female lead was clearly a girl. So, I will simply say: Park Min Young looked more convincing as a man than Ju Jingyi. This may be due to the difference in quality since one aired in 2010 and the other in 2020, or the costuming and the makeup. Ju Jingyi has very ‘feminine’ and ‘delicate’ features, she’s tiny and it doesn’t help that the three other leads are practically giants (she’s 1.59m and the actor playing Yu Lexuan is 1.87m). Another point would be that Ju Jingyi’s makeup was very obvious, her skin is naturally really pale, and they made her lips red with pink eyeshadow on her lids, which stood out a lot.



Lee Sun-Joon and Feng Chengjun
Sorry to lovers of our male lead but I found him to be quite a bland male lead in comparison to the supporting roles in both adaptations. In my opinion Lee Sun-Joon was more tolerable and appealing compared to Feng Chengjun. But the character overall is just not that interesting, purely for the fact that he is too perfect. Some may find that extremely appealing for a character, however I needed him to have a flaw which he didn’t. He’s good academically, he’s good at sports (archery), he’s nice, rich and can fight. In most dramas he would be the perfect second lead but, in this case, they tried to make the male lead have all the characteristics that people love of the second lead and not execute it well. Lee Sun-Joon had a few flaws which were slightly fleshed out, but Feng Chengjun had practically none. Both actors played the character the best they could. I personally preferred Park Yoo-Chun’s version over Song Weilong’s.


Moon Jae-Shin and Lei Zixin
Our second leads, who everyone roots for but unfortunately doesn’t get the girl. Both characters are similar in the versions. Lei Zixin is more aggressive than Moon Jae-shin and is far more hostile and protective over Wenxi than Jae-Shin was over Yoon-Hee. This is largely due to the more prominent role of second male lead that Zixin had. The bl aspects between him and Lexuan/Yong-Ha that were in the original were less obvious. In the Korean original, Moon Jae-Shin is secretly actually very smart whereas Lei Zixin is less intelligent in the Chinese remake. It’s as though most of his intelligence went to Yu Lexuan’s character in order to make Yu Lexuan a bigger character role. I would choose Yoo Ah-In’s Moon Jae-Shin over Wang Ruichang’s Lei Zixin.


Gu Yong-Ha and Yu Lexuan
They are the third male leads (???) if you can count them as that. I am biased over this character as Yu Lexuan was what introduced me to the Chinese adaptation, as he is played by NEXT’s Bi Wenjun. This character is probably my favourite out of the four leads. The two versions of the character are quite different. Gu Yong-Ha is more flirtatious and carefree- almost ditzy at times, whereas Yu Lexuan is mysterious, sly and intelligent. Yu Lexuan is a more developed character compared to Gu Yong Ha and has a larger role in the drama than the original. However, I can’t choose between the two on who I prefer. The character as whole was my favourite so if I had to choose between the amount of screen time, then Bi Wenjun’s Yu Lexuan had more than Song Joong-Ki’s Go Yong-Ha.


Differences in Plot – Things I liked and didn’t like:

How each of them found out she was a girl?

Before watching SS, I hadn’t considered that they would change the order of how they discover that she’s a girl in the remake. Different people discover who she is in different ways. A large factor for the change was because of the more significance Yu Lexuan had in the story in comparison to Go Yong Ha.
The first discovery was when Moon Jae-Shin sees Kim Yoon-Hee bathing in the shed. Go Yong Ha had directed her to bathe in the shed claiming that ‘no one went there’. This was a comedic scene since upon discovery Moon Jae-Shin did his best to try and prevent the other two from entering the shed whilst Kim Yoon-Hee was oblivious to the lengths he was going to prevent them from going in. This comedic scene was different in In a Class of Her Own, where Yu Lexuan is the one that catches her bathing. Lexuan too goes to lengths to prevent people from the academy from entering the shed during their ghost hunt. However, he also considers revealing that she is a girl to the student council president in order to save his reputation. Both end up helping the female lead from discovery behind the scenes.
The next discovery is when Lee Sun-Joon saves Kim Yoon Hee from drowning and as he is about to do CPR, he notices… the boobs. We have the two classic ways of discovering that your friend is actually a female, both involve seeing the other’s body rather than a direct and honest reveal. In the remake, it is Lei Zixin who does CPR on Xue Wenxi. I am not sure who’s I prefer in this incidence, since both suit the context of their own drama. Lee Sun-Joon was full on questioning his sexuality at that point and the relief he feels when he finds out she is a girl is like a weight lifted off his chest (bc homophobia). With Zixin he is coyer and doesn’t actually reveal to Wenxi that he knows that she is cross dressing which makes it comedic in the aspect that he has to keep her secret whilst trying to act normal and hiding it from everyone - even Lexuan who already knows.

The final discovery is not included in Sungkyunkwan Scandal. Go Yong-Ha is probably the first one to actually figure out that she is a girl but never explicitly says so, or is it shown when he finds out. He just provides a lot of hints and jokes whilst saying ‘I’m Gong Yong-Ha’. Feng Chengjun is the last one to find out the real identity of his ‘Bin-di’ in ‘In a Class of Her Own’. His was a rather cheap way to find out, it was like the writers had forgotten that the male lead hadn’t yet found out the true gender of the female lead and they just threw it in there. He finds out after overhearing the conversation between Wenxi and her kidnappers.

The reveal of Yu Lexuan and Go Yong-Ha’s background
This was a change in the remake that I preferred. Their background is generally the same they are both from non-wealthy families in comparison to the ideal for the scholars. The difference lies in how it was originally hidden. Go Yong-Ha’s family had been added to a minister’s family genealogy after they had gained land owned by his family. That way it was hidden from everyone. Yu Lexuan is from a poorer family which is excused when first discovered since Wenxi was also like that. However, he was also a child born out of wedlock which was not allowed in the school. How his background was hidden was actually through the School Council President Han Shengzi (Korean: Ha In Soo), who had known his background but helped him into the school and from there Lexuan would have to be in his debt. This I preferred because it not only explained Lexuan’s actions but also added depth to Han Shengzi.

The Han/ Ha family
This is my favourite change that In a class of her own made. Both the school council president, Han Shengzi and his sister, Han Shumin have their redemption. Han Shumin is much more independent and strong-willed after the rejection from Feng Chengjun, then Ha Hyo Eun. Although Shumin is still annoying at times, she still decided to study and tried to make herself a better person.
Han Shengzi was way more pitiful and less evil then, he was in Sungkyunkwan Scandal. As a school council president, he had more depth in terms of his friendship with the council members and Yu Lexuan. Also, there was an actual explanation on the relationship between him and the courtesan, Mu Xiaoman, which made his hatred for Wenxi more understandable.

Overall, I would say that both dramas have the flaws and their differences. The original is of course the original - it’s more serious whereas the remake is light-hearted and modernised. It depends on preference for which is better.

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Complété
Period_addict
1 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
déc. 1, 2023
20 épisodes vus sur 20
Complété 0
Globalement 10
Histoire 9.5
Acting/Cast 10
Musique 10
Degrés de Re-visionnage 9.0
Cette critique peut contenir des spoilers

Wow double wow… make it triple!

I just finished watching my first K-drama, and I must say that it exceeded my expectations. Although I was initially hesitant to listen to Korean as I'm more used to Chinese, the fantastic acting, superb scriptwriting, and perfect casting quickly won me over. The chemistry between the actors was palpable, and the engaging music, especially the beautiful violin pieces, added a special touch to the whole experience. I was particularly impressed by the lack of major inconsistencies, which is usually a pet peeve of mine.

Compared to the Chinese version of this story, which I found immature and unpolished, this Korean version was tenfold better. It accurately portrayed class inequality, and the geisha-eng character was way more believable and well-cast than in the Chinese version, where she looked like a kid in disguise. Although the king walking around as a commoner was a bit unbelievable, I still enjoyed the quartet in both dramas.

However, I must point out some flaws that detracted from the show's perfection. The directors and scriptwriters could have done better with certain details, such as the handkerchief on top of the hair, the clothes bandage on a deep cut without sewing or medicine, and the hand on the hair instead of the forehead. Also, it was unrealistic that a person could disguise themselves as a gesheang in just a few minutes, and a single red bruise after getting kicked by ten guys was not convincing.

Despite these minor faults, I thoroughly enjoyed this drama, and it has made me a fan of K-dramas. I appreciate that K-dramas are more open-minded regarding sex and LGBT+ and do not ridicule man love man like some Chinese dramas. The conversation about loving and being attracted to a man was intriguing and handled sensitively. The only downside was the epilogue, which could have been better even if the ending was happy.

In conclusion, I highly recommend this drama to everyone. It's a must-watch that deserves to be rewatched. Kudos to the quartet, who stole my heart with their performances.

Lire davantage

Cet avis était-il utile?
Sungkyunkwan Scandal (2010) poster

Renseignements

Statistiques

  • Score: 8.2 (marqué par 23,347 utilisateurs)
  • Classé: #1552
  • Popularité: #270
  • Téléspectateurs: 47,447

Top Contributeurs

24 éditions
18 éditions
14 éditions
9 éditions

Listes populaires

Listes apparentées d'autres utilisateurs

Récemment vu par