Renseignements

  • Dernière connexion: Il y a 11 heures
  • Lieu: Hic Sunt Dracones
  • Contribution Points: 11 LV1
  • Rôles: VIP
  • Date d'inscription: décembre 13, 2019
  • Awards Received: Flower Award1

burhaa aadmi

Hic Sunt Dracones

burhaa aadmi

Hic Sunt Dracones
Leverage korean drama review
Complété
Leverage
4 personnes ont trouvé cette critique utile
by burhaa aadmi
déc. 18, 2019
16 épisodes vus sur 16
Complété
Globalement 6.0
Histoire 5.0
Jeu d'acteur/Casting 7.0
Musique 5.5
Degrés de Re-visionnage 1.0
The original Leverage was one of my favourite TV series, and one of VERY few US series that I enjoyed watchging for its entire run. I was excited by the casting for this one, so was keen to check it out. In the end, it was the casting that kept me going to the end of a rather stodgy, pale and humourless remake. Kim Sae Ron shone, her character the one most like the equivalent in the original, and she played it well.

While Kim Sae Ron's "Parker" was good enough to keep me hanging on, sadly, the same can NOT be said for Yeo Hoi Hyeon's "Hardison". How much of it was the writing and how much the actor, I don't know, but what I do know is that while Hardison in the original was awesome, and the complicated relationship between him and Parker was pivotal, in this version, the hacker character was just lame and annoying. Also, the Korean remake REALLY missed a great chance by not casting someone like Sam Okyere. I say that not simply because he's of African descent, as the original was, but because in the small roles I have seen him in, he gave off the same sort of amused detached outsider vibe of the original.

Some of the heists were fun in this remake, but the "big bad" was a big bore - seen it ALL before. K Dramas seem to have a fetish for mysterious cabals, and the EXACT nature of this secret plot have been used more times than I can remember in Dramas I've seen. The result was that I FF'd large chunks of this Drama to make sure I didn't fall asleep from boredom. Hence, 6/10 - and young Ms Kim is responsible for 4 of those 6.
Cet avis était-il utile?